EPF Pension: DELHI High Court restrains EPFO from taking coercive steps on the basis of recovery notices for higher pension
Contents News/Article Date: 6th June 2023
Relating to which Act: The Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; The Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) Act, 1948
Penalty under the Act: Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made by himself under this Act [the Scheme, the [Pension] Scheme] or the Insurance Scheme] or of enabling any other person to avoid such payment knowingly makes or causes to be made any false statement or false representation shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine of five thousand rupees, or with both].
Applicable to which State: All the States and Establishments to be covered by these Acts
Type: Delhi High Court Judgement –
Advocates Kushank Sindhu, Abhishek K. Singh, Apali Kaushal, Anmol Singh, Manpreet Kaur and Suman N Rawat appeared for petitioners.
Standing Counsel for EPFO Siddharth and Advocate Amit Kr. Agrawal represented the respondents.
Title: SHRI PAN SINGH RAWAT v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. and other connected
Pertains to: PF registered establishments and members
Relevance of this news: Karma Global is in the business of HR Services, Payroll, Outsourcing and Regulatory Compliances right from its inception in 2004 and since then, has brought in a lot of efficiencies and technological upgradations with experts on its roll, to ease the hassles of Payroll Processing, Temp Staffing, On-boarding, Employee Life Cycle, Statutory, Regulatory and Payroll compliances by providing customized solutions to all its elite clients.
Karma Global has set up its offices in UK, USA, UAE, Canada and South East Asia and is fully into providing solutions for workplace issues, employment law advice, immigration and negotiation, representation in employment tribunals and involvement in leading cases, addressing HR issues in line with Labour Laws, payroll, staffing and talent acquisition.
And in the current instance: The Delhi High Court recently restrained the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) from taking any coercive steps with respect to the notices issued to various pensioners by it for making recoveries of the differential amount on higher pension received by them from many years.
Justice Rekha passed the interim order in the pleas moved by four pensioners who, after their superannuation from different organizations, were drawing higher pension beyond the ceiling limit based on the options sought by EPFO in 2018/19.
Subject: EPF Pension: Delhi High Court Restrains EPFO from Taking Coercive Steps On Basis of Recovery Notices for Higher Pension
Appended is the complete news item
EPF Pension: Delhi High Court Restrains EPFO from Taking Coercive Steps On Basis of Recovery Notices for Higher Pension
The Delhi High Court recently restrained the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) from taking any coercive steps with respect to the notices issued to various pensioners by it for making recoveries of the differential amount on higher pension received by them from many years.
Justice Rekha Palli passed the interim order in the pleas moved by four pensioners who, after their superannuation from different organizations, were drawing higher pension beyond the ceiling limit based on the options sought by EPFO in 2018/19
The pensioners challenged the communication issued by EPFO on February 20 directing all the Regional Provident Fund Commissioners to take actions to stop higher pension of all those individuals who superannuated prior to 01.09.2014, without giving any option for higher pension before their superannuation
“Consequently, till the next date, the respondents will stand restrained from taking any coercive steps in furtherance to the impugned notices issued to the petitioners seeking to make recoveries of the differential amounts on account of the higher pension which they have received for the last many years, the court ordered.
The pensioners also challenged the orders passed by the authorities on May 01 directing them to refund the differential amount received by them toward pension beyond the ceiling limit, on the basis of the options for higher pension
It was submitted on behalf of the pensioners that once the authorities had themselves given them an option to opt for higher pension which was duly exercised, they could not have misinterpreting the decision of the Supreme Court in Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Anr. Etc. v. Sunil Kumar B and others and reopened their cases.
It was also submitted that similar petitions were moved before Kerala High Court, Punjab and Haryana High Court and Himachal Pradesh High Court wherein interim orders were passed and EPFO was directed to maintain status quo as existing on 01.01.2023.
Issuing notice in the plea, Justice Palli noted that the authorities did not deny that the interim orders directing them to maintain status quo have been passed by the High Courts in question.
“Accordingly, while granting six weeks’ time to the respondents for filing counter affidavit and four weeks’ time for filing rejoinder thereto, it is for reasons of parity with the orders passed by the aforesaid three High Courts, the respondents are directed to maintain status quo qua the pension being received by the petitioners, as on 01.01.2023,” the court ordered.
It added that the interim directions will be subject to any clarification by the Supreme Court of its decision in Sunil Kumar B case. The matter will now be heard on September 21.
Advocates Kushank Sindhu, Abhishek K. Singh, Apali Kaushal, Anmol Singh, Manpreet Kaur and Suman N Rawat appeared for petitioners.
Standing Counsel for EPFO Siddharth and Advocate Amit Kr. Agrawal represented the respondents.
Title: SHRI PAN SINGH RAWAT v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. and other connected matters
