Disallowance of EPF Contribution due to Late Deposit u/s 36(1) (va) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication – 16th June 2023

Disallowance of EPF Contribution due to Late Deposit u/s 36(1) (va) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication

Contents News/Article Date: 16th June 2023

Relating to which Act: The Income Tax Act 1961; Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963

Applicable to which State: Whole of India   

Type: The Income Tax Act of 1961 is a comprehensive statute that sets the rules and regulations that govern taxation in India. The Income Tax Act contains a total of 23 chapters and 298 sections according to the official website of the Income Tax Department of India.

Pertains to: Establishments and Employees                                                                 

Relevance of this news: Karma Global is in the business of HR Services, Payroll, Outsourcing and Regulatory Compliances right from its inception in 2004 and since then, has brought in a lot of efficiencies and technological upgradations with experts on its roll, to ease the hassles of Payroll Processing, Temp Staffing, On-boarding, Employee Life Cycle, Statutory, Regulatory and Payroll compliances by providing customized solutions to all its elite clients.

Karma Global’s expert team is fully involved in handling of any type of compliance matters where compliance burden and complex laws falls on businesses like frequent changes and amendments, high penalties, inadequacy of knowledge and expertise with centralized compliance monitoring systems and integrated governance risk and compliance software’s

And in this instance: The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed re-adjudication for the disallowance of workers’ provident fund (PF) contributions because they were made after the deadline in accordance with section 36(1) (VA) of the Income Tax Act of 1961.  Integrity Verification Services Pvt.Ltd, the appellant assesse filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…

Subject: Disallowance of EPF Contribution due to Late Deposit u/s 36(1) (va) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]

Appended is the complete news item

Disallowance of EPF Contribution due to Late Deposit u/s 36(1) (va) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication

Source: Taxscan

The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed re-adjudication for the disallowance of workers’ provident fund (PF) contributions because they were made after the deadline in accordance with section 36(1) (VA) of the Income Tax Act of 1961.  Integrity Verification Services Pvt.Ltd, the appellant assesse filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

Disallowance under Section 36(1) (va) was upheld since the employee contribution wasn’t deposited by the due date

This appeal is made in opposition to the decision made by the CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [NFAC], on December 27, 2012, as indicated by DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048280517(1) for the AY 2018–19.

The sole issue involved in this appeal is with regard to disallowance u/s. 36(1) (va) in order dated 22.08.2019 u/s. 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] and confirmed by the CIT(Appeals).

The assesse is a partnership firm engaged in the business of food preparation and sweets etc. It filed return of income for AY 2018-19 declaring total income of Rs.1,04,89,720. The return was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act determining total income of Rs.1,22,14,931, disallowing Rs.17,25,211 towards delay in payment of employee’s contribution to PF and ESI u/s. 36(1) (va) of the Act. 4. On appeal before the CIT(Appeals), the assessee submitted that out of Rs.17,25,211, a sum of Rs.15,55,547 was paid within the due date as per the EPF & ESI Acts and the balance of Rs.1,29,106/- was paid within the due date for filing return as per 139(1) of the Act. However, there was inadvertent error while filing Form 3CD in mentioning the correct qualifying dates of remittances. The correct details of contribution to EPF and ESI are as under: –

In view of the above, it was submitted that the total amount of Rs. 15,55,547 has been deposited within the time prescribed under the respective Acts and therefore no addition is warranted to that extent.

The assessee also submitted that there was a delay in remittance of EPF & ESI under the respective Acts, but the remittance was made before the due date for filing return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act, the details of which are as follows and hence no disallowance is called for: –

Observation of the court

In view of the above, we remit this issue to the AO with a direction to examine and decide the issue in the light of the above Accordingly this issue is allowed for statistical purpose.

As far as the employee’s contribution to EPF & ESI the details of which are extracted in para 6 of this order to the extent of Rs. 40,588/- is concerned, the submission of the assessee is that these remittances were within the due date for filing return u/s. 139(1) of the Act, though they were belated payments under the respective Acts and hence no disallowance is called for. This issue is settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment in Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. Vs CIT-1, [2022] 143 com 1 78 (SC) wherein it is held that that Section 43B(b) does not cover employees’ contributions to PF, ESI etc., deducted by employer from salaries of employees and that employees contribution has to be deposited within the due date u/s 36(1)(va) i.e. due dates under the relevant employee welfare legislation like PF Act, ESI Act etc. failing which the same would be treated as income in the hands of the employer u/s.2(24)(x). Respectfully following this judgment, we sustain the disallowance to the extent of Rs. 40,588/- towards belated remittances towards employee’s contribution to EPF & ESI under the respective Acts.

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Pronounced in the open court on this 02nd day of May, 2023.

Conclusion

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and ruled in favour of the assessee