Supreme Court: Order Of Termination Approved By Industrial Tribunal Is Binding On Parties, Labour Court Can’t Take Contrary View
Contents News/Article Date: 5th October 2022
Relating to which Act: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section
Type: Supreme Court Judgement – The bench comprising Justice MR Shah and Justice Krishna Murari
Pertains to Case Title: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs Bharat Singh Jhala (Dead) Son of Shri Nathu Singh, through Legal Heirs & Anr | CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6942 of 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 818
Relevance of this news: Karma Management Global Consulting Solutions Pvt. Ltd has been in the business of Payroll, Outsourcing, and Regulatory Compliances from its inception in 2004 and since then, has brought in a lot of efficiencies and technological upgradations with experts on its role, to ease the hassles of Payroll Processing, Temp Staffing On-boarding Management, Regulatory and Payroll compliances by providing customized solutions to all its elite clients.
Karma Global handles thousands of provisions under several labour law acts. Labour laws are the ones dealing with employment laws in any organization – whether it is a manufacturing organization or trading organization or shop and establishment. The labour laws address the various administrative rulings (such as employment standing orders) and procedures to be followed, compliance to be made and it addresses the legal rights of, and restrictions on, working people and their organizations. By and large, the labour law covers industrial relations, certification of unions, minimum wages, labour management relations, collective bargaining, and unfair labour practices, and very important workplace health and safety with good environmental conditions. Further, the labour laws also focus on employment standards, including general holidays, annual leave, working hours, unfair dismissals, minimum wage, layoff procedures, severance pay, and many other issues related to employer and employee and the various compliance requirements.
In this regard, Karma Global also takes up a lot of matters related to disputes and litigations where it has now teamed up with S. D. Puri & Co. for legal and para-legal work including court cases, and settlements.
Subject : Supreme Court: Order Of Termination Approved By Industrial Tribunal Is Binding On Parties, Labour Court Can’t Take Contrary View.
For greater details, appended below is the complete news item
Supreme Court: Order Of Termination Approved By Industrial Tribunal Is Binding On Parties, Labour Court Can’t Take Contrary View
The Supreme Court of India in the case Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation vs Bharat Singh Jhala (Dead) Son of Shri Nathu Singh, through Legal Heirs & Anr, observed that that order of termination approved by an Industrial Tribunal is binding on the parties and a Labour Court cannot take a contrary view against it.
The bench comprising of Justice MR Shah and Justice Krishna Murari observed and stated that once the order of termination was approved by the Industrial Tribunal on appreciation of the evidence led before it, thereafter it was stated that the findings recorded by the Industrial Tribunal were binding between the parties and no contrary view could have been taken by the Labour Court contrary to the findings being recorded by the Industrial Tribunal.
The bench observed that a workman was subjected to departmental enquiry for not issuing tickets to 10 passengers after collecting the fare. Thus, at the conclusion of the departmental enquiry, his services were terminated. The termination was the subject matter of the approval application before the Industrial Tribunal in an application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Act. In the said proceedings, it was permitted by the management to lead the evidence and prove the charge/misconduct before the Tribunal. By order, the Tribunal approved the order of termination.
It was observed that after a judgment and an award in 2019, the Labour Court, Jaipur allowed the said reference and set aside the order of termination. An order was passed by the Labour Court while awarding 50% back wages from the date of termination till his death i.e., December 10, 2018. The Award and the judgment passed by the Labour Court were challenged before both, Single and Division Benches of the High Court. However, the petitions were dismissed both times.
The Court observed after going through the relevant facts of the case that once the order of termination was approved by the Industrial Tribunal, thereafter the fresh reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, wherein challenging the order of termination was not permissible.
Adding to it, the court stated that it is required to be noted that the order dated 21.07.2015 passed by the Industrial Tribunal which as such is a higher form than the finality has been attained by the Labour Court.
Before the High Court, though the aforesaid fact was pointed out, the court did not consider this aspect and confirmed the judgment and award passed by the Labour Court for setting aside the order of termination, which has been approved by the Industrial Tribunal.
It was held by the Supreme Court that the judgment and award passed by the Labour Court, confirmed by the High Court is unsustainable and allowed the appeal plea.
It has been committed by the High Court that a very serious error in dismissing the writ petition/writ appeal confirming the judgment and award passed by the Labour Court setting aside the order of termination.