Payment Towards Employee’s Contribution to Provident Fund After Due Date Is Not Allowable as Deduction: ITAT
Contents News/Article Date: 1st March 2023
Relating to which Act: The Income Tax Act 1961; Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963; Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
Applicable to which State: Whole of India
Type: The Income Tax Act of 1961 is a comprehensive statute that sets the rules and regulations that govern taxation in India. The Income Tax Act contains a total of 23 chapters and 298 sections according to the official website of the Income Tax Department of India.
Pertains to: Establishments and Employees
Relevance of this news: Karma Global is in the business of HR Services, Payroll, Outsourcing, and Regulatory Compliances right from its inception in 2004 since then, has brought in a lot of efficiencies and technological upgradations with experts on its role, to ease the hassles of Payroll Processing, Temp Staffing, On-boarding, Employee Life Cycle, Statutory, Regulatory, and Payroll compliances by providing customized solutions to all its elite clients.
Karma Global’s expert team is fully involved in the handling of any type of compliance matters where compliance burden and complex laws falls on businesses like frequent changes and amendments, high penalties, the inadequacy of knowledge and expertise with centralized compliance monitoring systems and integrated governance risk and compliance software’s
And in this instance: The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payment towards an employee’s contribution to the provident fund after the due date is not allowable as a deduction.
The two-member bench of Sandeep Singh Karhail (Judicial Member) and Om Prakash Kant (Accountant Member) has relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. and ruled that the non-obstante clause under Section 43B or anything contained in that provision would not absolve the assesse from its liability to deposit the employee’s contribution on or before the due date as a condition for the deduction.
Subject: Payment Towards Employee’s Contribution to Provident Fund After Due Date Is Not Allowable as Deduction: ITAT
Appended is the complete news item
Payment Towards Employee’s Contribution to Provident Fund After Due Date Is Not Allowable as Deduction: ITAT
Source: Live law Update
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that payment towards an employee’s contribution to the provident fund after the due date is not allowable as a deduction.
The two-member bench of Sandeep Singh Karhail (Judicial Member) and Om Prakash Kant (Accountant Member) has relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. and ruled that the non-obstante clause under Section 43B or anything contained in that provision would not absolve the assessee from its liability to deposit the employee’s contribution on or before the due date as a condition for the deduction.
The appellant/assessee filed its return of income on 10/02/2021, declaring a total income of Rs.459,03,58,100. The return was processed after an addition of Rs. 6,30,42,740 was made on account of delayed payment towards the employee’s contribution to the provident fund under Section 36(1) (va).
The CIT (A) dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. According to CIT(A), if the employer fails to deposit the entire amount towards the employees’ contribution on account of the provident fund with the concerned department on or before the due date, the assessee is not entitled to a deduction.
The ITAT noted that the employee’s contribution to the provident fund was deposited by the assessee after the due date prescribed under the relevant statute but within the due date of filing the income tax return.
The ITAT ruled that the taxpayer’s claim of deduction for the employee’s contribution to PF and ESI was incorrect, necessitating a prima facie adjustment.
Case Title: Deutsche India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asstt. Director of Income Tax